Pastor Confidentiality (A Commentary On Neil Schori)
Sunday, December 16, 2007
Audio is not yet ready. Check back soon
This past week Neil Schori got on Fox News and shared that Stacy Peterson had confided in him when she told him that her husband had killed his third wife. Now she is missing and the police are suspecting her husband. While the potential murder of this young woman has me very saddened, what I think the bigger injustice so far is that Neil Schori broke his oath as a pastor and went on national TV to divulge this. Here is what I think: no pastor should share what has been said in confidence, even if it saves lives and protects children. How's that for valuing the pastor/parishioner relationship. You think I am wrong? Join the conversation.
This file should automatically start playing when loaded.
If it does not, hit the play button.
Or if you would like to download the MP3 onto your computer, right click (Macs: Ctrl-Click)
on this link and select "Save Target As" (or "Download Linked File")
Or if you would like to download the MP3 onto your computer, right click (Macs: Ctrl-Click)
on this link and select "Save Target As" (or "Download Linked File")
Join the Discussion and Post A Comment
Show Poll: When should a pastor be required to divulge information shared by a parishioner?
| In the case of any illegal activity done by the parishoner |
| 22% | |
| In the case of certain, highly offensive illegal activity (child molestation, murder, rape, etc...) |
| 27% | |
| In the case of only crimes that involve children (child molestation, pornography, etc...) |
| 4% | |
| Never. The pastor/parishioner privilege should be as important as attorney/client privilege. |
| 47% |
