Stallworth vs. Vick

Sunday, June 21, 2009


Audio is not yet ready. Check back soon


One NFL player gets 2 years in prison, another 30 days. One NFL player kills a man because he was drunk, another killed some dogs. Which punishment fits which crime? Well apparently our culture feels killing dogs is worse than killing humans because the Dontae Stallworth got 30 days for killing a man while under the influence, and Michael Vick got 2 years for killing some dogs. Give me a break! Join the conversation as we look at this ridiculous precedent and why human life should always be valued more than animals.

This file should automatically start playing when loaded. If it does not, hit the play button.
Or if you would like to download the MP3 onto your computer, right click (Macs: Ctrl-Click)
on this link and select "Save Target As" (or "Download Linked File")

Twitter Digg Facebook Newsvine
Embed: Link:
Comments
Join the Discussion and Post A Comment
Name:
Email Address
(mandatory - always private
also will be used for gravatar):
Website/Blog (optional):

(Standard HTML Tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,i,li,ol,ul - abusers will be logged and blocked)
 
Are You Human? (Captcha)
(Capitlization doesn't matter)
Premium user avoid this step and have access to other tools. Sign Up Here. 		Captcha

Show Poll: Which NFL player should do the most jail time for their crime?

Burress for Carrying a Gun in New York Results_15%
Vick for Dogfighting in Virginia Results_224%
Stallworth for DUI Manslaughter in Florida Results_371%